Monday, 8 April 2013

Andy Warhol



In commemoration of the 25th anniversary of the death Andy Warhol, the most influential artist of the late 20thcentury, a selected number of his films are displayed in Osage Gallery, Kwun Tong. Meanwhile, in “Andy Warhol: 15 Minutes Eternity” exhibition, more than 370 objects by Warhol was shown in Hong Kong Museum of Art.


In 1960s, Warhol continued to paint and attempted to make a name for himself in pop art, simultaneously, he started to make films. From 1963 to 1968, he made nearly 60 films.

Sleep

Sleep is one of Warhol’s first films. The film showcases Warhol’s close friend, the poet John Giorno, sleeping for 8 hours. Unlike other ordinary films screening in cinemas, sleep focuses on a man’s sleeping process and there is no plot, no other characters, no obvious body movement and no sound. Shot sometimes changes to close-up of the man’s head, abdomen or other parts of his body. I do some research and find something interesting. According to the reporting by a manager, the theater was in chaos during the screening of the film. The static shot of one man’s asleep seemed to be endless, irritating the audiences that they left, they yelled and they asked for their money back. Though I was not in the theater that night, I am sure the chaotic scene audiences created must be well-worth watching while comparing to the film itself. The audiences’ responses were expected since if I were one of them I might also behave like that. However, something is expectable does not mean it is reasonable. Why did people have those manners and behaviors even they had know the film was strange and unusual? What made people cannot tolerate the longtime sleeping scene displaying something everyone would do every day? What did people think a film should be like? 




Giorno was first asked to be filmed sleeping just after Warhol had purchased his 16mm Bolex, and the shooting began in his apartment in 1963 summer. The film, and also the later similar ones with different theme, such as Kiss (1963) and Eat(1964), were all give a name “anti-films", that challenged the conventions of the filmmaking.  Warhol has said:

               "I could never finally figure out if more things happened in the sixties because
               there was more awake time for them to happen in (since so many people were
               on amphetamine), or if people started taking amphetamine because there were
               so many things to do that they needed to have more awake time to do them in...
               Seeing everybody so up all the time made me think that sleep was becoming 
               pretty obsolete, so I decided I'd better quickly do a movie of a person sleeping. 
               Sleep was the first movie I made when I got my 16mm Bolex."

From his words, it is apparent that the anti-film, Sleep, except challenging the filmmaking, challenged the acceptance and patience of the audiences, also the mental state of people in 1960s as well.

Above is the film, Kiss, shot later after sleep, involving the homosexual, bisexual or heterosexual couples. In 1960s US, i believe the bisexuality and homosexuality are some irritating issues in the society, indicating the avant-grade of his theme. Kissing is the couples’ only behavior on the screen, that make their love pure, simple but not naive and eternal.
 


Outer and Inner Space

What first attracted me was not the film itself but the girl cast in the film Edie Sedgwick. With her thick, black kohl eyeliner, bouffant short hair and enormous antique earrings dripping priceless jewels, she creates her own unique style and easily draws anyone’s attention. When watching the film, if you are careless like me, you may misunderstand that Edie is talking to someone. She keeps talking, sometimes draws on her cigarette, laughs or pulls a face. All her responses are perfectly pleasing that it is difficult to tear my eyes from the screen. Also because in this version we cannot hear what Edie is saying, we can only guess through her expressions and movements. But later I discovered that Edie is actually talking to no one but just responding in real time to her video image!! And that is why the film has such a name, “outer and inner space”.

Between 1964 and 1966, the pop artist shot approach to 500 short movies — the so-called “screen tests”, of Warhol's friends, celebrities and models. We can find the trace of Edie, the factory girl.


Blow Job



When I started watching this film, what I saw is a man’s face and he is enjoying something. After I read the name of the film, blow job, the man’s facial expression can be explained. Audiences cannot hear the man groaning, but they know he is enchanted. Standing before the screen (in front of the man) and watching him receiving oral sex, the audience seems to be the person giving a blow job to the man.

The person getting the blow job in the film was DeVerne Bookwalter. However he was not the original person planned for the casting. The original one was called Charles Rydell, who had agreed to be filmed, even understanding that he had to show his face and accept five different boys keep on blowing him until he came. But finally, he did not show up for the shoot while all the machines and boys were ready. i quit to find out the fact if five boys or the paid prostitutes gave the job or even no one did that finally. All are left to imagination.


MAO Tse Tung (1972)



MAO Tse Tung 1972
As everyone knows, Warhol was adept in using technique of acrylic and silkscreen-ink on canvas create art pieces, including portraits of celebrities, such as the Chairman of the Communist Party of China, Mao Tse Tung, the major sex symbol, Monroe Marilyn and the former first lady of United States, Jacqueline Kennedy. The portraits are shown in “Andy Warhol: 15 Minutes Eternity” opened in Hong Kong, especially the ones of Mao Tse Tung which are rejected to be exhibited in China.
In 1972, after U.S. president Richard Nixon’s visit to China, Warhol created these astonishingly brilliant images of Mao using changeable colors. However some people consider these portraits are disrespectful since Mao seems to wear cosmetics, leading the portraits banned by China. In fact, not only Mao’s portraits, many art pieces by other artists involving in political or other sensitive issues would be controversial and arouse people’s concerns. Artwork is often used as a medium to transmit information, critique or record something worth memorizing, etc.

Campbell's Soup Cans (1962)

Campbell's Soup Cans(1)
Campbell's Soup Cans(2)
Warhol’s series of Campbell’s soup can paintings were first exhibited in 1962. When asking about the paintings, Warhol said: "I used to drink it. I used to have the same lunch every day, for twenty years, I guess, the same thing over and over again." Apparently, the Campbell’s soup was what everybody recognize and popular in daily life of people including Warhol. But the one who could put the image of soup cans on canvas was Warhol. People would hardly believe that soup cans could be converted into art work. However even there was another man creating such an art work, if the man did not have reputation as Warhol had, the art work might not become well-known. Until now, Campbell’s soup cans still inspire artists.



Self-Portraits
self-portraits(1)


self-portrait (2)

Throughout his life, Warhol often played up his unusual looks and pale complexion to startling effect. Above are his last self-portraits, just made in the year before his death, draw particular attention to his exaggerated wig. Besides making a name for himself in pop art, Warhol established himself in the public eye as the most famous Pop artist via his different images. As what he said,

       ‘If you want to know all about Andy Warhol, just look at the surface:
       of my paintings and films and me, and there I am'

       ‘There’s nothing behind it.’

Then how much can you know about him, after seeing so many pieces by him. I would pretend to say, ' very little', that i can have an excuse to memorize this leading figure of Popism and his works.
 










Asia Hotel Art Fair Hong Kong 2013




                                                        
 
                                                       
In AHAF HK 2013, 60 Asian Galleries participated which enabled us to have a chance appreciating the pieces by artists from diverse countries.
by artist Pure Evil (1)




by artist Pure Evil (2)



by artist Pure Evil (3)

by artist Pure Evil (4)

the process of creation



These are the portraits of different women. Each portrait is composited by several parts of a woman’s heads without any detailing features, but being sufficient to display her expression and emotion. Each part is painted entirely by one color. Each color may sometimes goes well with or is in stark contrast to its adjacent color. Minimalism and popism are what I think of.
The artist is a London-based street artist and most of his works are particularly political driven. He believes that painting on the wall is a good way to get his message across in a big way. It seems that there must be some meanings behind his works though I cannot find any from this series. But at least, I have a feeling of heart-broken as the women and pretend to be alright.

Shanghai Lady-Mahjong and artist Yu Nancheng
Another two pieces by china-based artist, Yu Nancheng, also caught my eyes, which are named “Shanghai Lady-Mahjong” and “Tai Chi”. What make his pieces outstanding is his usage of colors and oil painting technique. China red and gray uses, are in a huge contrast. From the positive sides, China red is one of signature color that represents something festive whereas the gray, particularly the dark gray, is used as a color of mourning. The disharmony between the two colors triggers the awareness of the significance of the artwork. People are painted entirely red, coincidently do something relating to Chinese traditional culture, namely playing mahjong and Tai Chi. The background is painted gray, from where we can see the existence of chair manufactured only in 19th century and the Tian’anmen Square with Chinese flag, intimating the reign of Chinese Communist Party. All of above remind us in the period of the so called Cultural Revolution, how the Chinese traditional culture was abandoned and considered as outdated and even cancerous! 
Tai Chi


Two in One
Katsu Ishida’s piece, “ Two in One”, is an abstract, drawn using mixed media. Three colors, white, black and gray, are exploited. When taking the first look of the piece, there is no idea what the piece displayed. But if seeing carefully with our own imagination, always combined with our past experiences or current emotions, a meaningful picture will be formed. There are many faces covering on the canvas and the largest one is set in the central. From my perspective, this piece shows us a world in the war that some people are crying, screaming and suffering while some “devils” are planning to be the controller of the world. What can you perceive from it?




by Katsu Ishida


by AHN Jun(1)
Among all pieces in AHAF, the most impressive and shocking artworks should be the series of self-portrait (photography) by Korean artist, Ahn Jun. If without the existence of the artist in the photos, the photos can still show us the fabulous views of the landscapes, countryside and the cities, but certainly in a way that cannot surprise us. However, the photos really surprise us. The artist is captured with different “poses”, which are not simply stabilized but still have tendency to move. For instance, on the roof, she seems to jump out and fall down, or she is sitting on the window and she may drop. Most of the photos show how close to the death the artist is. Besides, with the pale skin and straight hair, the atmosphere of horror and fear is enriched. What the photos display is no longer static due to the involvement of the artist, but dynamic, similar to the movie, repeating showing us the story of the artist. But if we assume ourselves to be the art on the photos, her experiences become ours. Namely, we are experiencing with the artist that how the death is approachable.
by AHN Jun(2)
by AHN Jun(3)



 Other artworks i like:
  



  
  
 


Monday, 25 March 2013

When Faith Moves Mountains (an Art Work by Francis Alys)





Paradox of Praxis 1:






When Faith Moves Mountains[1]


When we are still suspecting whether a Chinese fable, which is about the story of a “foolish” man moving a giant mountain, is possible to happen or not, hundreds of people have proved how faith really moves mountains in Ventanilla, an area outside a city called Lima. On April 11 2002, five hundred volunteers participated in an art project by the Belgian-born artist, Francis Alys. They were given shovels and asked to form a single line at the foot of the huge sand dune. By the end of their work, they moved a sand dune which was sixty hundred foot long about four inches from its original position. The entire action was recorded as documentary by the artist.



As Alys said, the action itself has the potential to be a social allegory, under the circumstance of Ventanilla. Around 2000, the local people suffered a lot, experiencing the collapse of the Fujimori dictatorship, owning the memory of escaping the civil war during ‘80s and ‘90s, living in a place there was no electricity and running water, but clashes and resistance movements. The volunteers seemed to represent the local residents, though in the blistering summer day that shifting sand was everywhere, still working and sweating, attempting to move “the mountain”. They succeeded and simultaneously showed us their courageous defiance of the nature, also the government, their current living situation.



When Faith Moves Mountains[2]
The action is again an expression of what Alys realizes in the philosophy area. Alys’ another piece in which he showed us how a large block of ice became water through kept pushing the ice on the street, telling us sometimes to make something is really to make nothing. Vice versa, through the mountain moving action, Alys told us sometimes to make nothing is really to make something. The act of each volunteer was simple and seemed to do nothing aimlessly. But finally, they really did something “impossible”.



The documentary of the action may not be seen as an artwork by most people but just a record of an event. The piece is so different while comparing to the artworks in the galleries or art performances on the stage, from which it is hard to discover the visual aesthetic. But can the creation and appreciation of beauty be the standard to identify whether something is artwork or not? In the past years, art was displayed using different media and the process and method to create art changed a lot. Doing something may be one sort of art, via an indistinct way.



When Faith Moves Mountains[3]
Paradox of Praxis 1[1]
Paradox of Praxis 1[2]
Reference list:

1.       Thatcher Lisa, Francis Alÿs – Art that Moves Mountains(2012)





Sheerin Mark, Francis Alÿs: Paradox of Praxis I (Sometimes Doing Something Leads to Nothing)


2.       Sheerin Mark, Francis Alys: Paradox of Praxis I (Sometimes Doing Something leads to Nothing) (2010)